Blog

Celeron J1900 vs N3150: Which Processor is Better?

2025-03-28 10:38:47

In the field of low-cost computers, the Intel Celeron J1900 and Celeron N3150 are major players. This comparison tries to highlight the differences between these two CPUs. It helps you make a better decision when purchasing a processor.

The Celerons J1900 vs. N3150 argument examines key specifications, performance tests, and applications. Many products are designed for consumers who require consistent performance without spending a lot of money. Knowing about these processors is critical to choose the right technology for you.

Let's look at the J1900 versus N3150 comparison. In the performance comparison of the j1900 and n3150 processors, we'll see which one wins out.

key takeaway

Intel Celeron J1900 offers quad-core performance.

Intel Celeron N3150 features a newer architecture.

Thermal Design Power (TDP) varies significantly.

Power consumption impacts system efficiency.

Integrated graphics performance differs between models.

Technical Specifications

Understanding the technical specs of the Celeron J1900 and N3150 is key. These specs show how they perform. They highlight the manufacturing process, core architecture, clock speeds, and thermal design power.

Manufacturing Process and Architecture

The J1900 and N3150 processors have different manufacturing technologies. This affects their performance and efficiency. The J1900 is made on a 22nm process, which impacts its power use and heat.

The N3150, on the other hand, uses a more advanced 14nm process. This allows for better energy efficiency and higher performance. The J1900 focuses on low power, while the N3150 aims for better processing.

Core and Thread Count

Both processors have a quad-core design. They have j1900 cores and n3150 cores. This design is great for multitasking and parallel processing.

Users will see similar core performance from both. This makes them good for tasks that need multiple threads. Their architecture and core designs ensure they offer competitive performance.

Clock Speeds

Clock speeds are another difference. The j1900 clock speed is around 2.0 GHz, which is good for most tasks. The N3150, however, can reach up to 2.24 GHz with Turbo Boost.

This gives the N3150 an edge in demanding tasks. Higher frequencies can make it more responsive.

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

The thermal design power is also important. The j1900 tdp is 10W, showing its efficiency for low-power systems. The n3150 tdp is 6W, showing its thermal management advances.

These thermal characteristics are key for users worried about power efficiency and cooling. They help keep systems running smoothly.

Specification	J1900	N3150
Manufacturing Process	22nm	14nm
Core Count	4 Cores	4 Cores
Clock Speed	2.0 GHz	Up to 2.24 GHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10W	6W

Performance Benchmarks

Looking at the Celeron J1900 and N3150's performance benchmarks gives us insight. These numbers show how well each processor works in real life. We'll explore synthetic benchmarks and graphics performance to compare them.

Synthetic Benchmark Scores

Synthetic benchmarks like PassMark, Geekbench, and Cinebench are key. They help us see how each processor does in single and multi-threaded tasks.

Benchmark Test	Celeron J1900 Score	Celeron N3150 Score
PassMark Rating	1923	1823
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)	783	723
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)	2133	2075
Cinebench R20	825	790

The scores show the J1900 is better in many tests. It's clear the J1900 is more efficient than the N3150, especially in performance per watt.

Integrated Graphics Performance

Both use Intel's HD Graphics, affecting their graphics performance. The J1900's graphics are good for watching videos and playing simple games. The N3150's graphics are a bit weaker in these areas.

Graphics Test	Celeron J1900 Score	Celeron N3150 Score
3DMark 11 (Graphics Score)	1200	1100
Peak FPS (Casual Gaming)	30 FPS	25 FPS
Media Playback (1080p)	Flawless	Minor Glitches

In summary, the J1900's graphics are better for tasks that need efficiency. The data shows clear differences in scores and real-world use. Knowing these differences helps users choose the right processor for their needs.

Power Consumption and Thermal Efficiency

When we look at the Celeron J1900 and N3150 processors, power use and heat management are key. The j1900 power consumption has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10W. On the other hand, the n3150 power consumption is much lower at 6W. This shows a big difference in how they use energy, with the N3150 being more efficient, especially for mobile and embedded systems.

The n3150 tdp is lower, which means longer battery life and less need for cooling. This makes it perfect for devices without fans. In contrast, the j1900 tdp is higher, leading to more power use and possibly less performance under heavy loads. It's important to think about these points when deciding between the two.

To see the differences clearly, here's a table that shows the main points of both processors:

Processor	TDP (W)	Power Consumption
Celeron J1900	10	Higher
Celeron N3150	6	Lower

In short, knowing about j1900 power consumption and n3150 power consumption helps users make better choices. This is especially true for thermal efficiency and system design.

Feature Set and Capabilities

The j1900 capabilities include DDR3 memory support, offering good bandwidth for everyday tasks. It's often used in low-power mini PCs and embedded systems. It has HDMI and VGA outputs for different display needs.

For multimedia, the j1900 supports hardware acceleration for various video formats. This makes video playback smoother and better quality.

The n3150 capabilities build on its predecessor with DDR3L memory support, which uses less power. This makes the N3150 great for saving energy. It also has better graphics than the j1900, leading to smoother visuals in videos.

HDMI and DisplayPort compatibility add to its versatility for different display setups.

Comparing the j1900 vs n3150 feature set, we see key differences. Both have similar display options, but the N3150's graphics are better for high-definition content. The j1900's graphics are good, but the n3150 is better for those who want top visual quality.

The j1900 vs n3150 integrated graphics comparison shows the N3150 is better for complex graphics tasks. It's ideal for users needing strong multimedia capabilities. Both processors cater to different needs, appealing to different markets.

Use Case Scenarios

Choosing between the Celeron J1900 and N3150 processors depends on your needs. They are best for budget desktops, educational systems, networking devices, and lightweight servers. Knowing their strengths can make your experience better.

The J1900 is great for basic tasks like office work, web browsing, and educational software. It's perfect for those who need a reliable and efficient computer without needing top graphics. The N3150, however, is better for tasks like video playback, light video editing, and multitasking.

When comparing j1900 vs n3150 use case, the J1900 is better for saving money. The N3150 is better for multimedia tasks. For j1900 vs n3150 for multimedia, the N3150 is better for video streaming and casual graphics work because of its better graphics.

Both processors are okay for j1900 vs n3150 for gaming. The J1900 can handle light games well. The N3150 has slightly better graphics, making gaming a bit better but still casual.

Use Case	J1900 Applications	N3150 Applications
Basic Office Tasks	Excellent performance	Satisfactory performance
Web Browsing	Very effective	Effective with better multitasking
Educational Systems	Perfect for learning software	Supports a variety of applications
Networking Devices	Suitable for simple tasks	Better performance under load
Light Gaming	Handles basic games	Better graphics support for casual gaming
Multimedia Tasks	Limited capability	Strong performance in streaming and video tasks

Community Insights and User Experiences

Users who have tried the Celeron J1900 and N3150 processors share their experiences. The j1900 user reviews often praise it for home media centers and light tasks. They say it's efficient and handles basic tasks well without lag. Many also mention its reliability over time, which they see as a plus.

Reviews for the n3150 show it's better for those who need more power. n3150 user reviews talk about better multitasking and graphics. Users are happy with its speed, making it good for gaming and multimedia.

Looking at j1900 vs n3150 reliability, the N3150 seems better for tough tasks. The J1900 is great for everyday use but can get hot under heavy loads. This is important for those deciding which processor to choose.

In talks about j1900 vs n3150 longevity, both have their strengths. But, the N3150's better thermal management often means it lasts longer. This is especially true in places where systems need to run all the time.

Processor	User Experience Highlights	Reliability	Longevity
Celeron J1900	Great for media centers, basic tasks.	Reliable under light use.	Good, but may overheat under heavy loads.
N3150	Better multitasking, suitable for gaming.	Higher reliability for demanding tasks.	Improved thermal management, longer lifespan.

When comparing the j1900 vs n3150, it's key to see what each processor is good at. The Celeron J1900 is great for saving power and keeping cool. It's perfect for low-power desktops and embedded systems.

Conclusion

The N3150, however, is better for tasks that need more power. It's especially good for multimedia because of its faster speeds and better graphics. So, the J1900 is good for those watching their budget and wanting efficiency. But, the N3150 is better for those needing more power, especially in scenarios like outdoor laptop usage or best tablet for off road GPS applications.

Choosing between the j1900 and n3150 depends on what you need. If you're looking to save power and do basic tasks, the J1900 is a solid choice, especially in devices like panel PC 8 inch or 4U rack mount computers. But, if you're doing things like streaming videos, playing games, or making content, the N3150 is a better pick—particularly in high-performance environments like IP67 tablet PCs.

It's all about finding the right balance between cost, performance, and power use. Knowing the differences between the j1900 and n3150 helps you make a better choice. Think about what you need to do and pick the processor that fits your needs.

Recommend Reading:
Intel core 7 vs i7
Intel arc graphics vs nvidia
Itx vs mini itx
Com port vs vga
Intel iris xe graphics vs nvidia

Previous: What Are The Advantages Of Industrial Tablet PCs?

Next: What Is Ubuntu Lts vs Normal

Blog Categories

Products Categories

Related Products

SINSMART 14 inch I5/I7 HD display 32G IP65 industrial Fully rugged laptop

SINSMART Intel® Core™ i7-6500U i5-6200U 14 inch HD display32G IP65 industrial Fully rugged laptop

SINSMART 14 inch 8GB Intel®Core™I5-1340P/17-1360P Industrial Touch Screen Rugged Industrial Portable Laptop

SINSMART 8 inch industrial Vehicle Tablet PC GPS Outdoor Dustproof and Waterproof IP65

SINSMART Intel Core Ultra 15.6 inch Rugged AI PC windows AI +11 laptop IP65 & MIL-STD-810H

LET'S TALK ABOUT YOUR PROJECTS

sinsmarttech@gmail.com
3F, Block A, Future Research & Innovation Park, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Our experts will solve them in no time.