Leave Your Message
AI Helps Write
HDMI 2.1 vs. DisplayPort 1.4: Which Is Better for Your Setup?

Blog

HDMI 2.1 vs. DisplayPort 1.4: Which Is Better for Your Setup?

2025-02-26 13:18:10


Table of Contents


In the realm of consumer electronics, selecting the appropriate digital interface is critical.  It has an impact on your setup's video quality, game performance, and visual clarity.  HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4 are excellent options for higher resolutions, quicker refresh rates, and smoother audiovisual experiences.

 VRR, ALLM, and eARC are some of the exciting features of HDMI 2.1.  DisplayPort 1.4 excels at DSC and high data rate support.  This article compares them to help you pick the best option for your needs.

Key Takeaways
Both HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4 are leading digital interfaces in consumer electronics.
HDMI 2.1 includes features like VRR, ALLM, and eARC that enhance gaming performance and audiovisual quality.
DisplayPort 1.4 excels with DSC and high bit rate support, ideal for professional applications requiring high visual clarity.
Choosing the right interface depends on your specific needs, whether for gaming, home entertainment, or productivity.
Understanding the key specifications and features of each can help you make an informed decision for your setup.


Key Specifications Breakdown

Understanding HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4's specs is key to choosing the best setup. Both offer unique benefits, like bandwidth, data rates, and support for high resolutions and refresh rates. They also use different compression technologies.

A. Bandwidth and Data Rates

HDMI 2.1 has a bandwidth of 48 Gbps, which is impressive. It ensures smooth and reliable data transfer. DisplayPort 1.4, with a bandwidth of 32.4 Gbps using HBR3, is also robust and suitable for many applications.
HDMI 2.1's higher bandwidth means better data rates. This is great for transferring large amounts of data without losing quality. Both HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4 are excellent for gaming consoles, high-end PCs, and professional workstations.

B. Resolution and Refresh Rate Support

HDMI 2.1 supports resolutions up to 10K, making it future-proof. It also handles 4K and 8K at high refresh rates. This is perfect for gaming and media.
DisplayPort 1.4 can go up to 8K at 60Hz and 4K at 120Hz, 144Hz, and 240Hz. It's great for those who need high refresh rates for gaming or graphic tasks.

C. Compression Technology

Compression technology is crucial for these interfaces. HDMI 2.1 uses DSC to handle high-resolution content efficiently. This ensures quality is not lost, even at high data rates.

DisplayPort 1.4 also uses DSC for high-resolution displays. Its DSC technology ensures fast and efficient data transmission. This is ideal for high frame rate applications, pushing DisplayPort's capabilities.


C. Purpose of the Comparison: Performance, Compatibility, and Future-Proofing
This guide compares resolution support, gaming features, and hardware compatibility to help you decide. From screen tearing fixes to UHD playback, we’ll explore what each offers.

Technical Specifications Breakdown

When comparing DisplayPort 1.2 and DisplayPort 1.4, the technical specifications reveal why these display interface standards cater to different needs. From bandwidth to resolution support, understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing gaming performance, monitor setups, or high-resolution workflows.


A. Bandwidth and Data Rates

The core distinction lies in data rate capabilities, directly affecting video and audio transmission.


DP 1.2: 17.28 Gbps with HBR2

Launched with High Bit Rate 2 (HBR2), DisplayPort 1.2 delivers up to 17.28 Gbps. This bandwidth supports solid performance for mid-tier PC gaming and productivity, but it hits limits with modern demands like high frame rate displays.

DP 1.4: 32.4 Gbps with HBR3

DisplayPort 1.4 steps up to 32.4 Gbps using High Bit Rate 3 (HBR3). This leap enables 8K at 60Hz and 4K at 144Hz, making it ideal for high-end gaming and immersive experience setups. The increased display bandwidth also supports multi-display configurations with less strain.


B. Resolution and Refresh Rate Capabilities

Resolution and refresh rate support define what each standard can handle, impacting visual clarity and gaming smoothness.


4K, 5K, and 8K Support

DP 1.2: Handles 4K at 60Hz or 1440p at 120Hz, sufficient for UHD media or casual gaming. It tops out at 5K with reduced refresh rates (e.g., 30Hz).

DP 1.4: Pushes to 8K at 60Hz or 4K at 240Hz with DSC, perfect for next-gen displays and competitive gaming. It also manages 5K at higher frame rates.

120Hz, 144Hz, and Beyond

DP 1.2 supports 120Hz at lower resolutions like 1440p, but struggles beyond that. Conversely, DP 1.4 excels with 144Hz and 240Hz at 4K, reducing screen tearing and stutter via adaptive sync like G-Sync and FreeSync.


C. Compression and Encoding

Compression technology marks a significant upgrade in DP 1.4, enhancing its versatility.


Display Stream Compression (DSC) in DP 1.4

DP 1.4 introduces DSC, a compression technology that squeezes data without noticeable loss in signal quality. This allows 10K resolutions or HDR at higher refresh rates, critical for advanced graphics and video transmission. For example, 8K at 60Hz is unfeasible without DSC due to bandwidth constraints.

DP 1.2’s Uncompressed Limitations

DisplayPort 1.2 relies on uncompressed video, capping it at 17.28 Gbps. Without compression, it can’t handle 8K or heavy multi-monitor setups efficiently, limiting its resolution scaling.


Specification Comparison Table

Feature DP 1.2 DP 1.4
Bandwidth 17.28 Gbps (HBR2) 32.4 Gbps (HBR3)
Max Resolution 4K at 60Hz 8K at 60Hz (DSC)
Refresh Rate 120Hz at 1440p 240Hz at 4K
Compression None DSC


This breakdown highlights how DP 1.4’s HBR3, DSC, and broader resolution support outpace DP 1.2, offering technology upgrades for monitor compatibility and seamless playback.


Feature Comparison

The feature set of DisplayPort 1.2 and DisplayPort 1.4 shapes their suitability for gaming, productivity, and media consumption. From multi-monitor capabilities to visual clarity, these display standards offer distinct advantages based on their technical specifications.


A. Multi-Monitor Support

Both versions support multi-display setups, but DP 1.4 enhances flexibility.


Multi-Stream Transport (MST) in Both Versions

DisplayPort 1.2 introduced Multi-Stream Transport (MST), enabling daisy chaining of monitors. With its 17.28 Gbps bandwidth, it supports multiple 4K displays at 30Hz or 1440p at 60Hz, ideal for productivity or basic monitor setups.
Example: Two 4K monitors at reduced refresh rates.

DP 1.4’s Enhanced Multi-Display Capabilities

DisplayPort 1.4, with 32.4 Gbps and HBR3, leverages MST more effectively. Paired with Display Stream Compression (DSC), it handles 5K or 8K across multiple screens at higher frame rates. This suits advanced graphics workflows or immersive experience setups.


B. Gaming and Visual Features

For PC gaming, refresh rate support and adaptive sync are critical, and DP 1.4 shines here.


Adaptive Sync (G-Sync and FreeSync)

DP 1.2: Supports adaptive sync technologies like G-Sync and FreeSync, reducing screen tearing and stutter at 120Hz or lower resolutions (e.g., 1440p). It’s sufficient for casual gaming performance.
DP 1.4: Expands adaptive sync to 144Hz and 240Hz at 4K, leveraging its high bit rate. This delivers smoother competitive gaming and aligns with GPU support from NVIDIA and AMD.


HDR Support in DP 1.4

DisplayPort 1.4 introduces HDR, enhancing color depth and pixel density for high-resolution content. DP 1.2 lacks native HDR, limiting its appeal for UHD gaming or video transmission. With DSC, DP 1.4 ensures seamless playback of HDR at 8K or 5K.


C. Audio Capabilities

Audio features are less highlighted but still relevant for audiovisual experiences.

Shared Audio Features

Both DP 1.2 and DP 1.4 transmit multi-stream audio, supporting surround sound for media consumption. They work with display connectors like USB-C or Thunderbolt via Alt Mode, ensuring hardware compatibility.

DP 1.4’s Improved Audio Bandwidth

With its higher data rate, DP 1.4 allocates more bandwidth to audio, enhancing signal quality for complex formats. This benefits high-end gaming or monitor resolution setups with integrated sound systems.


Feature Comparison Table


Feature DP 1.2 DP 1.4
Multi-Monitor MST, 4K at 30Hz MST, 8K with DSC
Adaptive Sync Up to 120Hz at 1440p Up to 240Hz at 4K
HDR Not Supported Supported
Audio Support Basic Multi-Stream Enhanced Bandwidth
These differences highlight DP 1.4’s edge in gaming features, resolution scaling, and monitor compatibility, while DP 1.2 remains functional for setup flexibility and backward compatibility. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize high frame rate, visual clarity, or multi-monitor efficiency.

Use Case Scenarios

Choosing between DisplayPort 1.2 and DisplayPort 1.4 hinges on your specific needs, whether it’s gaming performance, productivity, or media consumption. Each excels in different use case scenarios, driven by their bandwidth, resolution support, and feature set.

A. Gaming Performance
For gamers, refresh rate, resolution, and adaptive sync dictate the experience.

DP 1.2 for Mid-Tier Setups
With 17.28 Gbps via HBR2, DisplayPort 1.2 supports 4K at 60Hz or 1440p at 120Hz. It’s ideal for casual PC gaming with mid-range graphics cards from NVIDIA or AMD. Features like G-Sync and FreeSync reduce screen tearing, but it struggles with high frame rate demands beyond 120Hz. Perfect for gamers on a budget or with older monitor setups.

DP 1.4 for High-End PC Gaming
DisplayPort 1.4’s 32.4 Gbps HBR3 and Display Stream Compression (DSC) unlock 4K at 240Hz or 8K at 60Hz. This suits competitive gaming and high-end gaming rigs, delivering visual clarity and seamless playback. HDR and enhanced adaptive sync elevate immersive experiences, making it a must for next-gen displays and cutting-edge GPU support.

B. Professional and Productivity Workflows
Multi-monitor setups and resolution scaling are key for professionals.

DP 1.2 for Basic Multi-Monitor Needs
DP 1.2 uses Multi-Stream Transport (MST) to daisy chain two 4K monitors at 30Hz or multiple 1440p screens at 60Hz. This works for productivity tasks like coding or design on a modest monitor resolution. Its backward compatibility ensures setup flexibility with older hardware, but bandwidth limits restrict higher refresh rates.

DP 1.4 for Advanced Display Configurations
With DSC and 32.4 Gbps, DP 1.4 powers 5K or 8K across multiple displays at usable frame rates. This is a boon for advanced graphics professionals, video editors, or multi-taskers needing high resolution and pixel density. Thunderbolt or USB-C Alt Mode compatibility adds versatility for modern display connectors.

C. Media and Entertainment
Video quality and audio matter for UHD enthusiasts.

DP 1.2 for Standard Video Playback

DisplayPort 1.2 handles 4K at 60Hz with uncompressed video, sufficient for media consumption like streaming or Blu-ray. Its audiovisual support includes multi-stream audio, but lacks HDR, capping its appeal for premium video transmission.

DP 1.4 for UHD and HDR Content

DP 1.4 shines with 8K at 60Hz and HDR, offering richer color depth and signal quality. It’s perfect for high-resolution movie playback or immersive experience setups, especially with monitor compatibility for 10K potential. Enhanced data rate ensures smooth technology upgrades for entertainment.

Compatibility and Hardware Considerations

Understanding hardware compatibility is essential when choosing between DisplayPort 1.2 and DisplayPort 1.4. From cable requirements to GPU support, these factors impact monitor setups, gaming performance, and resolution support.

A. Cable and Connector Differences

Cables and connectors directly affect signal quality and data rate.

DP 1.2: Uses standard DisplayPort cables rated for HBR2 (17.28 Gbps). These support 4K at 60Hz or 1440p at 120Hz, but cable length (typically 1-2 meters) limits signal stability for higher resolutions.
DP 1.4: Requires HBR3-capable cables to hit 32.4 Gbps. For 8K or 240Hz at 4K, certified DisplayPort cables or USB-C/Thunderbolt Alt Mode options ensure bandwidth. DSC demands premium cables for uncompressed video or compression technology.

B. Backward Compatibility with Older Standards

Both versions offer backward compatibility, enhancing setup flexibility.

DP 1.2: Works with earlier display interfaces (e.g., DP 1.1), defaulting to lower refresh rates like 30Hz at 4K.
DP 1.4: Fully compatible with DP 1.2 devices, scaling down to 17.28 Gbps if needed, but unlocking HDR and adaptive sync only with DP 1.4-ready hardware.

C. GPU and Monitor Support

Your graphics card and monitor resolution determine compatibility.

NVIDIA and AMD Integration: DP 1.2 suits older GPUs (e.g., GTX 900 series), while DP 1.4 aligns with modern cards (e.g., RTX 30/40 series) for high frame rate and multi-monitor setups.
Monitor Requirements: DP 1.2 monitors cap at 5K with 60Hz, whereas DP 1.4 supports 8K and 144Hz with monitor compatibility for pixel density and visual clarity.

Pros and Cons

Evaluating the pros and cons of DisplayPort 1.2 and DisplayPort 1.4 helps clarify their strengths for gaming performance, productivity, and media consumption. Each display interface balances bandwidth, resolution support, and hardware compatibility differently.


A. DisplayPort 1.2 Advantages and Limitations


Advantages:

Affordable and widely available for monitor setups with 17.28 Gbps HBR2 bandwidth.

Solid 4K at 60Hz or 1440p at 120Hz for casual PC gaming.

Multi-Stream Transport (MST) enables multi-monitor daisy chaining, ideal for productivity.

Strong backward compatibility with older display standards.


Limitations:

No HDR or DSC, capping visual clarity and 8K potential.

Limited refresh rate support beyond 120Hz, hindering high frame rate gaming.

Struggles with 5K or multi-display at higher frame rates.


B. DisplayPort 1.4 Strengths and Weaknesses


Strengths:

32.4 Gbps HBR3 and Display Stream Compression (DSC) unlock 8K at 60Hz and 4K at 240Hz.

HDR and enhanced adaptive sync (G-Sync, FreeSync) boost gaming features and immersive experiences.

Superior multi-monitor support for high-resolution workflows.

Future-proof for next-gen displays and advanced graphics.


Weaknesses:

Requires premium cables and monitor compatibility for full data rate.

Higher cost and less universal adoption than DP 1.2.


Which Should You Choose?

Deciding between DisplayPort 1.2 and DisplayPort 1.4 depends on your budget, hardware compatibility, and goals. Whether you prioritize gaming performance, multi-monitor setups, or high-resolution displays, here’s how to pick the right display interface.


A. Decision Factors: Budget, Setup, and Goals


Budget: DP 1.2 is cost-effective, leveraging existing cables and monitor setups with 17.28 Gbps HBR2. DP 1.4 demands premium HBR3 cables and newer hardware, raising costs.

Setup: For basic 4K at 60Hz or 1440p at 120Hz, DP 1.2 suffices. DP 1.4 shines with 8K, 240Hz, and multi-display via DSC.

Goals: Casual users stick with DP 1.2; enthusiasts chasing visual clarity and technology upgrades opt for DP 1.4.


B. Best for Casual Users and Older Systems


DisplayPort 1.2 fits mid-tier needs perfectly. Its bandwidth supports 4K at 60Hz, adaptive sync (G-Sync, FreeSync) for PC gaming, and MST for productivity. With backward compatibility, it’s ideal for older GPUs and monitor resolution limits, avoiding screen tearing on a budget.


C. Best for Gamers and High-Resolution Displays


DisplayPort 1.4 is the go-to for high-end gaming and UHD. With 32.4 Gbps, HDR, and 240Hz at 4K, it delivers high frame rate and immersive experiences. DSC enables 8K and multi-monitor setups, perfect for competitive gaming and next-gen displays.


D. Future-Proofing with DP 1.4


For resolution scaling and advanced graphics, DP 1.4 ensures longevity. Its display standard supports 10K potential and Thunderbolt/USB-C Alt Mode, aligning with modern GPU support from NVIDIA and AMD. When integrated into high-performance computing solutions such as rugged fanless PCs, embedded industrial computers, and Advantech industrial PCs, it enhances industrial automation and AI-driven applications.


Moreover, devices like industrial tablet PCs with Windows, industrial PC racks, and industrial notebook computers benefit from DP 1.4’s capabilities, ensuring optimal display performance for complex visualization tasks. In industries requiring durability and high precision, solutions like industrial tablets for manufacturing and ruggedized panel PCs contribute to streamlined workflows and enhanced productivity.


As innovation progresses, industrial computer manufacturers continue to develop future-ready solutions, integrating DP 1.4 to meet the evolving demands of industrial applications.



Related Products

0102

LET'S TALK ABOUT YOUR PROJECTS

  • sinsmarttech@gmail.com
  • 3F, Block A, Future Research & Innovation Park, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Our experts will solve them in no time.

AI Helps Write
  • Summer
  • Summer2025-05-23 13:49:41
    Hello, This is Summer, \*\* Senior consultant of Sinsmart. I am very glad to serve you. What questions do you want to consult?
  • The delivery time of the product
  • Can you provide the price list of the products?
  • I need to get a Quote.
  • Add my Whatsapp
  • What is the price of industrial computer?
  • I have some requirements, please help me choose products
  • How can i contact you?

Ctrl+Enter Wrap,Enter Send

  • FAQ
Please leave your contact information and chat
Hello, This is Summer, GPT Senior consultant of Sinsmart. I am very glad to serve you. What questions do you want to consult?
CHAT now
CHAT now